Current model comparison
AAPL vs GOOGL: current Qualtix model comparison
Compare Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc. using the same published Qualtix snapshot layer. AAPL has the stronger current public model view. Analysis date: 2026-10-23.
This comparison reads from the same public stock snapshot source as the individual stock pages, so scores, verdicts, valuation labels, and dates stay consistent.
Qualtix scores Business Quality, Valuation, and Entry Timing. Red flags and data-confidence checks provide additional context.
AAPL vs GOOGL current public model snapshot
| Metric | AAPL | GOOGL | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Quality | 81/100 | 69/100 | AAPL |
| Valuation | Expensive | Expensive | Context |
| Entry Timing | 53/100 | 70/100 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | 6.7% | 15.5% | GOOGL |
| FCF Margin | 29.3% | 11.9% | AAPL |
| Return on capital (pre-tax) | 80.7% | 19.6% | AAPL |
| Balance Sheet | Cash and investments $62.4B / Debt $84.3B | Cash and investments $242.5B / Debt $112.8B | Context |
| Verdict | STRONG BUY | HOLD | AAPL |
Why AAPL currently leads
- AAPL has the stronger combined model view after Business Quality, valuation, Entry Timing, and concern context are considered.
- The model reaches STRONG BUY because Business Quality is strong enough to outweigh the Expensive valuation label. Price still matters, so valuation stays listed as a caution.
- The model reaches HOLD because the current positives and limitations are mixed. The stock may be worth monitoring, but the model does not show a clean enough setup for a stronger verdict.
Snapshot dates
- Analysis date: 2026-10-23.
- Financial data through: AAPL 2026-06-27; GOOGL 2026-06-30.
- Model version: 2026-08-23.
- If a future candidate fails validation, the public comparison keeps using the last valid published stock snapshot.
Follow Qualtix on X, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube.
Qualtix is for research and education only. It is not financial advice.